Electric Power Distribution · North Carolina

Henderson Operations Center Complex

Henderson, NC · ~40 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Henderson Operations Center Complex runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade D.

Henderson Operations Center Complex: 1.7 TCR = 143% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Henderson Operations Center Complex safety composite

Henderson Operations Center Complex scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2024

Henderson Operations Center Complex injury rate improved

Henderson Operations Center Complex's TCR fell 3.7 from 5.8 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Henderson, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.7 · 143% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #46/107
  • PHOTO Flint SC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Flint SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Henderson Operations Center Complex in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Henderson Operations Center Complex averages 1.7 TCR (143% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Henderson Operations Center Complex TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Henderson Operations Center Complex falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 107 Electric Power Distribution employers in North Carolina.

Henderson Operations Center Complex (40 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Henderson Operations Center Complex
Henderson Operations Center Complex (40 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Henderson Operations Center Complex has fewer employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2016 5.8 5.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · NC · Henderson

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 69 employers in Henderson, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Flint SC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ridgeland 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lorain Medina Rural Electric Co-op 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corbitt Power and Light 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gary Thomas Farms 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-State Turf of NC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fords Produce Company Inc 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pender Nursery Inc. 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR DLP Maria Parham Health LLC 732 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maria Parham Health 719 FTE
CITY-NEAR Distribution Center-91011 628 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6091 622 FTE
NAT-TCR Primrose Community of Lubbock 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR J-LOK 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR American Ordnance LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 2324 Fre82 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale North Gilbert 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tanaq Environmental LLC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Callaway Gardens ALZ 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amber Glen Alz 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.