Transmission and distribution line construction · Wisconsin

Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland

Mcfarland, WI · ~223 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Transmission and distribution line construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland: 1.8 TCR = 64% of Transmission and distribution line construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland safety composite

Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland: 1.4 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.39× in 2020

Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland's TCR rose 1.1 from 1.4 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Mcfarland, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 64% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #15/40
  • PHOTO National OnDemand, Inc
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~223 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: National OnDemand, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland averages 1.8 TCR (64% of the Transmission and distribution line construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland falls in its industry

1,605 Transmission and distribution establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 40 Transmission and distribution employers in Wisconsin.

Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland (223 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland
Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland (223 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland has more employees than the Transmission and distribution line const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 1.8 0.9 4 0 0
2018 2.2 1.4 8 0 0
2017 1.1 1.1 3 0 0
2016 1.4 0.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · WI · Mcfarland

1,605 Transmission and distribution line construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 17 employers in Mcfarland, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR National OnDemand, Inc 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tucson Construction 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division #24 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Contracting 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE AscendTek, LLC 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Suburban Enterprises, Inc 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1-Kitchen & Bath Wisconsin Vitreous 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Calibre, Inc. - Dakota Drive Facility 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perfect Puzzle LLC 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR 534-00394 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR KS Energy Services (Madison) 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR KTL 53012 Madison 47 FTE
NAT-TCR Franklin Assembly 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tyson's Corner VA Store 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Crystal Clear Building Services, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 95 Parr Lumber Five Oaks Campus 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Minnetonka 6000 Clearwater ABRC - AFG 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakeland Community Hospital Watervliet 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakeshore Community Services, Inc. 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE NorthStar Battery Plant 2 223 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.