Community health centers and clinics, outpatient · Michigan

Henry Ford Medical Center Royal Oak

Royal Oak, MI · ~164 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Henry Ford Medical Center Royal Oak runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Community health centers and clinics, outpatient workplace, earning a grade D.

Henry Ford Medical Center Royal Oak: 6.3 TCR = 165% of Community health centers and clinics, outpatient BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Henry Ford Medical Center Royal Oak safety composite

Henry Ford Medical Center Royal Oak scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2022→2024

Henry Ford Medical Center Royal Oak injury rate improved

Henry Ford Medical Center Royal Oak's TCR fell 8.0 from 13.0 in 2022 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 13.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=13.0 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Royal Oak, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 165% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #64/91
  • PHOTO HFM Pierson Clinic
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~164 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HFM Pierson Clinic (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Henry Ford Medical Center Royal Oak in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Henry Ford Medical Center Royal Oak averages 6.3 TCR (165% of the Community health centers and clinics, outpatient BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Henry Ford Medical Center Royal Oak TCR series: 2022=13 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=5 · BLS 3.8

Where Henry Ford Medical Center Royal Oak falls in its industry

599 Community health centers and c establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 91 Community health centers and c employers in Michigan.

Henry Ford Medical Center Royal Oak (164 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Henry Ford Medical Center Royal Oak
Henry Ford Medical Center Royal Oak (164 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Henry Ford Medical Center Royal Oak has more employees than the Community health centers and clinics, ou median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 0.7 7 0 0
2023 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2022 13.0 7.8 8 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · MI · Royal Oak

599 Community health centers and clinics, outpatient employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 51 employers in Royal Oak, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HFM Pierson Clinic 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR UnityPoint Health Occupational Medicine Clinic 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salina Health Education Foundation 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benton County Health Services Building 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sachse Construction 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zoetis GMS South 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE 464 - Pharmacy Central Fill #2 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Castings LLC - Ludington 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-300 9,436 FTE
CITY-NEAR Royal Oak. 367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flex-N- Gate Royal Oak, LLC. 353 FTE
CITY-NEAR 018-00743 268 FTE
NAT-TCR SKS Delivery 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TMX2475 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - QXY8 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR PSL-The Oaks at Inglewood 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dfa-Kmp - Minneapolis Mn 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Intradeco Apparel 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moog Mineral Wells S-TEC Corporation 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1001 South Oyster Bay Rd 164 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.