Community health centers and clinics, outpatient · Michigan

Henry Ford Pharmacy Advantage Rochester

Rochester Hills, MI · ~154 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Henry Ford Pharmacy Advantage Rochester runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Community health centers and clinics, outpatient workplace, earning a grade D.

Henry Ford Pharmacy Advantage Rochester: 4.6 TCR = 122% of Community health centers and clinics, outpatient BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Henry Ford Pharmacy Advantage Rochester safety composite

Henry Ford Pharmacy Advantage Rochester scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2022→2024

Henry Ford Pharmacy Advantage Rochester injury rate improved

Henry Ford Pharmacy Advantage Rochester's TCR fell 4.5 from 6.9 in 2022 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=6.9 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Rochester Hills, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 122% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #44/91
  • PHOTO Henry Ford Jefferson…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Henry Ford Jefferson Clinic (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Henry Ford Pharmacy Advantage Rochester in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Henry Ford Pharmacy Advantage Rochester averages 4.6 TCR (122% of the Community health centers and clinics, outpatient BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Henry Ford Pharmacy Advantage Rochester TCR series: 2022=6.9 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Henry Ford Pharmacy Advantage Rochester falls in its industry

599 Community health centers and c establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 91 Community health centers and c employers in Michigan.

Henry Ford Pharmacy Advantage Rochester (154 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Henry Ford Pharmacy Advantage Rochester
Henry Ford Pharmacy Advantage Rochester (154 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Henry Ford Pharmacy Advantage Rochester has more employees than the Community health centers and clinics, ou median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.6 3 0 0
2022 6.9 4.6 1 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · MI · Rochester Hills

599 Community health centers and clinics, outpatient employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 107 employers in Rochester Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Henry Ford Jefferson Clinic 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newport 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartland Health Center, Inc 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comprehensive Community Health Centers 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwest Energy Cooperative 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE OCG Companies 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shoreline Fruit, LLC - Williamsburg 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Louisiana-Pacific Sagola 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR FANUC America Corporation - Rochester Hills 1,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford- Rochester Hills Data Center 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester Hills Data Center 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR InfuSystem, Inc. - Headquarters 367 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Forest Grove Light & Power 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Roseville - Maintenance Garage 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HCL2 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bradley Il - 3093 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stainless Tank 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Merrimac Industries Inc. 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE 105308 - Magnolia Power 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apex Parcel Delivery Service LLC 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.