Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing · Michigan

Herbert Building

Lansing, MI · ~99 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Herbert Building runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Herbert Building: 3.4 TCR = 104% of Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Herbert Building safety composite

Herbert Building scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2024

Herbert Building injury rate improved

Herbert Building's TCR fell 1.1 from 3.4 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Lansing, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 104% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #25/33
  • PHOTO Colorcon Stoughton
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~99 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Colorcon Stoughton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Herbert Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Herbert Building averages 3.4 TCR (104% of the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Herbert Building TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=2 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Herbert Building falls in its industry

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 33 Pharmaceutical preparations (e employers in Michigan.

Herbert Building (99 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Herbert Building
Herbert Building (99 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Herbert Building has fewer employees than the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 1.1 1 1 0
2023 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2022 2.0 1.0 1 1 0
2021 3.8 3.8 4 0 0
2020 8.1 4.5 7 2 0
2019 3.3 3.3 3 0 0
2018 4.5 3.3 4 0 0
2017 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2016 3.4 1.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · MI · Lansing

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 410 employers in Lansing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Colorcon Stoughton 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOFIE - Gilroy 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GRANULATION TECHNOLOGY, INC 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PL Developments 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reichenbach Ceiling & Partition Co. 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE JD Candler Roofing Company 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weather Shield Roofing Systems, Inc. 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE TK Elevator Detroit 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCC - Main 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Grand River Assembly 1,648 FTE
NAT-TCR HEXPOL Compounding NC Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Millview of Latham, LLC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Utilities 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR True Value Company RDC - Springfield 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Barrday-Charlotte 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Andover Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Turman Sawmill Inc. 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fulton Homes 99 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.