Food machinery repair and maintenance services · Louisiana

Heritage Foodservice-New Orleans

New Orleans, LA · ~33 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heritage Foodservice-New Orleans runs at 295% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Heritage Foodservice-New Orleans: 6.2 TCR = 295% of Food machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heritage Foodservice-New Orleans safety composite

Heritage Foodservice-New Orleans scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2020→2024

Heritage Foodservice-New Orleans injury rate improved

Heritage Foodservice-New Orleans's TCR fell 3.1 from 9.4 in 2020 to 6.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=9.4 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=6.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · New Orleans, LA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.2 · 295% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #60/60
  • PHOTO Best Repair Company …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Best Repair Company Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Heritage Foodservice-New Orleans in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heritage Foodservice-New Orleans averages 6.2 TCR (295% of the Food machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heritage Foodservice-New Orleans TCR series: 2020=9.4 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=6.3 · BLS 2.1

Where Heritage Foodservice-New Orleans falls in its industry

2,560 Food machinery repair and main establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 60 Food machinery repair and main employers in Louisiana.

Heritage Foodservice-New Orleans (33 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Heritage Foodservice-New Orleans
Heritage Foodservice-New Orleans (33 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Heritage Foodservice-New Orleans has fewer employees than the Food machinery repair and maintenance se median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.3 6.3 2 0 0
2023 6.3 3.1 2 0 0
2022 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2021 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2020 9.4 9.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · LA · New Orleans

2,560 Food machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 450 employers in New Orleans, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Best Repair Company Inc 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnetech industrial Services - Huntington 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6834-00800005-000002 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MIDWEST CYLINDER INC 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Riverside Plant 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilkinson Technologies 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Soil Environmental, Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pineville Service Center 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARAHAN COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARAHAN PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCMC Health 8,061 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARAHAN 4,395 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1455 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dfa Fluid - Salt Lake City Ut 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR North Kent Base 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Madera Component Systems, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE PSD Pittsburgh 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Twinsburg Medical Office 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Williams Lumber Branch 3000 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rypos, Inc. 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.