Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Virginia

Heritage Green Assisted Living

Mechanicsville, VA · ~53 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heritage Green Assisted Living runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Heritage Green Assisted Living: 3.1 TCR = 82% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heritage Green Assisted Living safety composite

Heritage Green Assisted Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Heritage Green Assisted Living: 0.0 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.5× in 2024

Heritage Green Assisted Living's TCR rose 9.3 from 0.0 in 2022 to 9.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mechanicsville, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 82% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #32/199
  • PHOTO The Welstone at Miss…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Welstone at Mission Crossing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Heritage Green Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heritage Green Assisted Living averages 3.1 TCR (82% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heritage Green Assisted Living TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=9.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Heritage Green Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 199 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Virginia.

Heritage Green Assisted Living (53 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Heritage Green Assisted Living
Heritage Green Assisted Living (53 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Heritage Green Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.3 4.7 4 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Mechanicsville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 71 employers in Mechanicsville, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Welstone at Mission Crossing 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Matthews of St. Francis II 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63065 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garden Club 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Power Home Solar Chester 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE GLOUCESTER 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE 324-NiSource-Suffolk VA-Harbour View 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Hopewell 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bon Secours Memorial Regional Medical Center 1,722 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bon Secours Memorial Regional Medical 1,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR RMC Events, Inc 1,572 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Regional Medical Center 1,528 FTE
NAT-TCR ICP Industrial 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Colorado Box Beef - Oklahoma 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR First Class Transport, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Baskins Machined Products 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Insa Auburndale FL 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Poet Terminal Savannah 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lbb-Ground Ops 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quirch Foods - Greensboro 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.