Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Illinois

Heritage Manor - Mt. Sterling #112

Mt. Sterling, IL · ~46 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heritage Manor - Mt. Sterling #112 runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade A.

Heritage Manor - Mt. Sterling #112: 1.2 TCR = 18% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heritage Manor - Mt. Sterling #112 safety composite

Heritage Manor - Mt. Sterling #112 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Heritage Manor - Mt. Sterling #112: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 65.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.99× in 2021

Heritage Manor - Mt. Sterling #112's TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2019 to 2.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 65.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Mt. Sterling, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 18% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #32/857
  • PHOTO Consolidated Resources
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Consolidated Resources (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Heritage Manor - Mt. Sterling #112 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heritage Manor - Mt. Sterling #112 averages 1.2 TCR (18% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heritage Manor - Mt. Sterling #112 TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=65.9 · 2021=2.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Heritage Manor - Mt. Sterling #112 falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 857 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Illinois.

Heritage Manor - Mt. Sterling #112 (46 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Heritage Manor - Mt. Sterling #112
Heritage Manor - Mt. Sterling #112 (46 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Heritage Manor - Mt. Sterling #112 has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2020 65.9 63.5 2 25 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · IL · Mt. Sterling

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 11 employers in Mt. Sterling, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Resources 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency Pacific Management, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Waters of Huntington SNF LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AHSCM31 OUR LADY OF PEACE NURSING CARE 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Carlyle KFC (MPF1) 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2502-Ashton, IL 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE MID AMERICA ENERGY SERVICES, INC. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utility Department 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dot Foods, Inc.- MTS Dot 1,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dot Foods- MTS 1,642 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dot Transportation, Inc.- MTS DTI 692 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dot Transportation- MTS 530 FTE
NAT-TCR H & D Farms, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 49311b - Ferndale Bin 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR South Hadley Converting Center 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hca - Mainland Center 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hca-Henrico Doctors - Parham 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hca-Columbia Bay Area Med Ctr 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE NAPA Main Store 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.