Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Illinois

Heritage Woods of Charleston

Charleston, IL · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heritage Woods of Charleston runs at 419% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Heritage Woods of Charleston: 15.9 TCR = 419% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heritage Woods of Charleston safety composite

Heritage Woods of Charleston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Heritage Woods of Charleston: 8.1 → 26.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 26.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2022

Heritage Woods of Charleston's TCR rose 18.5 from 8.1 in 2019 to 26.6 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Charleston, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.9 · 419% of ind

  • DART 8.9 DART
  • RANK #200/217
  • PHOTO Aegis of Shoreline I…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aegis of Shoreline II - Callahan House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Heritage Woods of Charleston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heritage Woods of Charleston averages 15.9 TCR (419% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heritage Woods of Charleston TCR series: 2019=8.1 · 2020=24.8 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=26.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Heritage Woods of Charleston falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #200 safest of 217 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Illinois.

Heritage Woods of Charleston (34 employees, TCR 15.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Heritage Woods of Charleston
Heritage Woods of Charleston (34 employees, TCR 15.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Heritage Woods of Charleston has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 26.6 8.9 6 0 0
2021 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 24.8 18.6 4 4 0
2019 8.1 4.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IL · Charleston

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 41 employers in Charleston, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Shoreline II - Callahan House 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Cedar City 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at Front Royal 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridgemill Senior Center LLC 15.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cresco Labs - Kankakee 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kendall Energy Facility 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Adams Electric 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Town of Normal - Water 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Illinois University 2,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charleston CUSD #1 360 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 612 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Illinois Area of Special Education 267 FTE
NAT-TCR Sockeye Timber Framing 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0020-0021-04142 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Jamaica Bay inn 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Cedar City 15.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE M1787 Sierra Vista 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pine Bluff School District 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE J&J 5619B Jacksonville 7500 Centurion 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE UNCROCKINGHAMHOSPEVS 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.