Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Heritage Woods Senior Living

Agawam, MA · ~52 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heritage Woods Senior Living runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Heritage Woods Senior Living: 1.4 TCR = 37% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heritage Woods Senior Living safety composite

Heritage Woods Senior Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2020

Heritage Woods Senior Living injury rate improved

Heritage Woods Senior Living's TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2017=1.9 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Agawam, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/210
  • PHOTO the Wellstead of Rog…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: the Wellstead of Rogers & Diamondcrest Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Heritage Woods Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heritage Woods Senior Living averages 1.4 TCR (37% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heritage Woods Senior Living TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=1.9 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Heritage Woods Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Heritage Woods Senior Living (52 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Heritage Woods Senior Living
Heritage Woods Senior Living (52 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Heritage Woods Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2017 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2016 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Agawam

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 65 employers in Agawam, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR the Wellstead of Rogers & Diamondcrest Senior Living 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Columbia 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Health & Social Services (5) 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Corinthians 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE SunBug Solar 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE North East Specialty Corp. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tocci Building Corporation 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Timberline Communications Inc. 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson Real Estate Investors, Inc 656 FTE
CITY-NEAR OMG, Inc. 517 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABC Express Delivery, Inc. 475 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diana's Bakery 308 FTE
NAT-TCR Lincoln Heights Elementary 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Federal Bureau of Prisons 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Alexander Chemical - Kingsbury, IN 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Icon Health & Fitness Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Avatar Hotel 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE RSCI Columbus 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Ivanhoe 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSC Industrial Outsourcing, LP-EPE 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.