Light rail system construction · Massachusetts

Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors

Somerville, MA · ~40 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Light rail system construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors: 0.4 TCR = 16% of Light rail system construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors safety composite

Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors held a steady TCR band

Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Somerville, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/18
  • PHOTO Trans Ash, Inc. - Be…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trans Ash, Inc. - Belews Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors averages 0.4 TCR (16% of the Light rail system construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors falls in its industry

932 Light rail system construction establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 18 Light rail system construction employers in Massachusetts.

Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors (40 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors
Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors (40 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors has fewer employees than the Light rail system construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · MA · Somerville

932 Light rail system construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 67 employers in Somerville, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trans Ash, Inc. - Belews Creek 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Track Generations, LLC. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hard Rock Directional Drilling LLC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turner at Pipe Fabrication Corpus Christi TX 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Hyde Park Gas 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Springfield, MA 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dacon Corporation 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crocker Architectural Sheet Metal Co., Inc. 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass General Brigham Inc 7,655 FTE
CITY-NEAR Partners Community Physicians Organization 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cataldo Somerville 513 FTE
CITY-NEAR AllWays Health Partners 486 FTE
NAT-TCR Arlington, TX - E Pioneer Pkwy 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-Ea-Dfw-Dallas Fort Worth-Dfw-Evhe 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The People Concern - SOLAR 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Port of LA, Harbor Administration Building 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG620 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE 26045 Portsmouth 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE SPFM-Laredo 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Coast Resources San Antonio 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.