Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing · Texas

HES COE Casing Equipment

Name: HES COE Casing Equipment Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Houston, TX · ~91 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.6
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HES COE Casing Equipment runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

HES COE Casing Equipment: 0.6 TCR = 17% of Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HES COE Casing Equipment safety composite

HES COE Casing Equipment scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2020→2021

HES COE Casing Equipment injury rate improved

HES COE Casing Equipment's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.1 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333132 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 17% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #54/208
PHOTO Weir SPM - Fort Wort…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Weir SPM - Fort Worth MFG (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.6
Weir SPM - For

0.6
Cameron A Schl

0.6
Cameron a Schl

0.6
National Oilwe

0.6

What this shows HES COE Casing Equipment averages 0.6 TCR (17% of the Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

HES COE Casing Equipment TCR series: 2020=1.1 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where HES COE Casing Equipment falls in its industry

316 Drilling equipment, oil and ga establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 208 Drilling equipment, oil and ga employers in Texas.

HES COE Casing Equipment (91 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3

HES COE Casing Equipment has fewer employees than the Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-ty median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2021	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2020	1.1	0.0	1	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333132 · TX · Houston

316 Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Weir SPM - Fort Worth MFG	FORT WORTH, TX	0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Cameron A Schlumberger Company	OKLAHOMA CITY, OK	0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Cameron a Schlumberger Company	BAYOU VISTA, LA	0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	National Oilwell Varco R&D Lab	HOUSTON, TX	0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	South Texas Oilfield Solutions, LLC	ALICE	91 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Quadvest LP	MAGNOLIA	91 FTE
STATE-SIZE	D.R. Horton, Inc. - North Central Texas	TEMPLE	91 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Leyendecker Builders & Contractors, Inc.	LAREDO	91 FTE
CITY-NEAR	IAH IAH	Houston	11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR	IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices	Houston	10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR	6925-IAH	Houston	9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center	Houston	8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR	TC Transcontinental Spartanburg	Spartanburg, SC	0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Lake Mary, FL Office CS	Lake Mary, FL	0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Harrisonburg Headquarters	Harrisonburg, VA	0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Menasha Packaging Company - Truman	Edison, NJ	0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	La Habra Convalescent Hospital	La Habra, CA	91 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Ruan Transport Corporation T-065	Salem, VA	91 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Ruan Transport Corporation T-549	Cedar Falls, IA	91 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Eastern Region	Muncy, PA	91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.