Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste · Missouri

HES Kansas City

Kansas City, MO · ~24 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HES Kansas City runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste workplace, earning a grade D.

HES Kansas City: 4.3 TCR = 165% of Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HES Kansas City safety composite

HES Kansas City scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

HES Kansas City: 2.9 → 8.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 13.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.85× in 2024

HES Kansas City's TCR rose 5.0 from 2.9 in 2016 to 8.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 13.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562211 · Kansas City, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 165% of ind

  • DART 8.0 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO MF FS
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MF FS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

HES Kansas City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HES Kansas City averages 4.3 TCR (165% of the Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HES Kansas City TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=13.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=8 · BLS 2.6

Where HES Kansas City falls in its industry

211 Hazardous waste treatment faci establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Hazardous waste treatment faci employers in Missouri.

HES Kansas City (24 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate HES Kansas City
HES Kansas City (24 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

HES Kansas City has fewer employees than the Hazardous waste treatment facilities com median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.0 8.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 13.5 9.0 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2018 6.8 6.8 2 0 0
2017 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2016 2.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562211 · MO · Kansas City

211 Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 1,023 employers in Kansas City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MF FS 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Systech Fredonia 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Envirosafe Services of Ohio, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clean Water Environmental, LLC - Dayton 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vanduser Gin Co Inc 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Service and Supply Cooperative, Bellflower MO 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Osage Plant 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dogwood Energy Facility 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass Service Organization 11,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hallmark Cards Mass Channel 11,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Merchandising Services (GMS) 9,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Mercy - Missouri 7,709 FTE
NAT-TCR Pitt Ohio - Cincinnati 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ECC Corrosion, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR XKO 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR OKC 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE HES Toledo 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rosemont Hockey Partners (game operations) 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summit 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Braden Plumbing Inc 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.