Copper products made by rolling, drawing, or extruding purchased copper · Pennsylvania

Heyco Metals Inc

Reading, PA · ~66 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heyco Metals Inc runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Copper products made by rolling, drawing, or extruding purchased copper workplace, earning a grade C.

Heyco Metals Inc: 3.8 TCR = 114% of Copper products made by rolling, drawing, or extruding purchased copper BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heyco Metals Inc safety composite

Heyco Metals Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Heyco Metals Inc: 1.5 → 6.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.81× in 2024

Heyco Metals Inc's TCR rose 5.3 from 1.5 in 2016 to 6.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331420 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 114% of ind

  • DART 6.8 DART
  • RANK #7/22
  • PHOTO Rea Magnet Wire -Gui…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rea Magnet Wire -Guilford (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Heyco Metals Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heyco Metals Inc averages 3.8 TCR (114% of the Copper products made by rolling, drawing, or extruding purchased copper BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heyco Metals Inc TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=6.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Heyco Metals Inc falls in its industry

198 Copper products made by rollin establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 22 Copper products made by rollin employers in Pennsylvania.

Heyco Metals Inc (66 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Heyco Metals Inc
Heyco Metals Inc (66 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Heyco Metals Inc has fewer employees than the Copper products made by rolling, drawing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.8 6.8 4 0 0
2023 3.5 1.8 2 0 0
2022 6.8 2.7 3 2 0
2021 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2020 4.9 1.6 3 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2018 2.8 1.4 1 1 0
2017 2.9 0.0 1 1 0
2016 1.5 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331420 · PA · Reading

198 Copper products made by rolling, drawing, or extruding purchased copper employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rea Magnet Wire -Guilford 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lucas Milhaupt Warwick 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Polymetalurgial 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berk-Tek LLC 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bream Orchards Inc 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donegal Egg 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE George E Ley Company 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE PG Mehoopany Site Construction 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Goldman Equipment, LLC - West Monroe 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Stark Truss Co., Inc. Edgerton, OH 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #63 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wagner's, LLC - Milford 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Blue Cube - Russellville Operations 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE RLS Logistics Freight Consolidation 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Carolina QCC 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Whitestown 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.