Tower, power distribution and communication, construction · California

HHS Construction, LLC

Ontario, CA · ~264 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HHS Construction, LLC runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tower, power distribution and communication, construction workplace, earning a grade D.

HHS Construction, LLC: 3.6 TCR = 128% of Tower, power distribution and communication, construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HHS Construction, LLC safety composite

HHS Construction, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

HHS Construction, LLC held a steady TCR band

HHS Construction, LLC's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.6 in 2017 to 3.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.6 · 2018=3.3 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Ontario, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.6 · 128% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #85/147
  • PHOTO Air2
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~264 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Air2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

HHS Construction, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HHS Construction, LLC averages 3.6 TCR (128% of the Tower, power distribution and communication, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HHS Construction, LLC TCR series: 2017=3.6 · 2018=3.3 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=3.9 · BLS 2.8

Where HHS Construction, LLC falls in its industry

1,605 Tower, power distribution and establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #85 safest of 147 Tower, power distribution and employers in California.

HHS Construction, LLC (264 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate HHS Construction, LLC
HHS Construction, LLC (264 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

HHS Construction, LLC has more employees than the Tower, power distribution and communicat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.9 3.5 17 1 0
2022 2.6 2.6 11 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 4 0 0
2020 6.8 6.1 8 13 0
2018 3.3 2.2 3 0 0
2017 3.6 2.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CA · Ontario

1,605 Tower, power distribution and communication, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Air2 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hutchins Telecom 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ANCHR - Charlotte- NC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ANS:ANASH - ANASH-Asheville, NC 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE T & P Farms, LP 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE I.S.A. CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC. 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE METRO CONSTRUCT/FIELD SERV - 1 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE SonRay Construction 264 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR McGregor PACE 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ecco Ride Florence 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mcgill Hose & Coupling Inc 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 55595 Rpta 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Omni PGA Frisco Resort 264 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bright Sheet Metal 264 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC. - 059 264 FTE
NAT-SIZE PNB Tumwater WA 264 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.