General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · Montana

Hi-Ball Trucking

Billings, MT · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hi-Ball Trucking runs at 137% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade D.

Hi-Ball Trucking: 6.2 TCR = 137% of General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hi-Ball Trucking safety composite

Hi-Ball Trucking scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2016→2024

Hi-Ball Trucking injury rate improved

Hi-Ball Trucking's TCR fell 6.7 from 10.1 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.1 · 2017=13.2 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Billings, MT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 137% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #11/15
  • PHOTO R+L Carriers - CHR
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: R+L Carriers - CHR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Hi-Ball Trucking in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hi-Ball Trucking averages 6.2 TCR (137% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hi-Ball Trucking TCR series: 2016=10.1 · 2017=13.2 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Hi-Ball Trucking falls in its industry

3,020 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 15 General freight trucking, long employers in Montana.

Hi-Ball Trucking (31 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hi-Ball Trucking
Hi-Ball Trucking (31 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Hi-Ball Trucking has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 6.3 6.3 2 0 0
2020 8.7 5.8 3 0 0
2019 8.3 2.8 3 0 0
2018 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2017 13.2 10.6 5 0 0
2016 10.1 7.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · MT · Billings

3,020 General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 327 employers in Billings, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR R+L Carriers - CHR 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR XGN 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rock Island IL FXFE-RKI 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holland - DE 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Main Office - 01 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stampede Packing Company 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillips Environmental Products Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Balanced Unitized Team, LLC 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Billings Clinic Hospital 2,366 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Vincent Healthcare 1,860 FTE
CITY-NEAR Billings Clinic Downtown Campus 1,223 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. John's Lutheran Ministries 651 FTE
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #144 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Coastal Transport Co., Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR FLL 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Toledo Oh 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Behr Paint Company Denver Distribution 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gateside, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mellette 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE FREEHOLD 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.