Engineering research and development laboratories or services · Minnesota

HID Global - Fargo

Eden Prairie, MN · ~124 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HID Global - Fargo runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Engineering research and development laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade C.

HID Global - Fargo: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HID Global - Fargo safety composite

HID Global - Fargo scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

HID Global - Fargo held a steady TCR band

HID Global - Fargo's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Eden Prairie, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/10
  • PHOTO Syngenta Greensboro
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Syngenta Greensboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

HID Global - Fargo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HID Global - Fargo averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HID Global - Fargo TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where HID Global - Fargo falls in its industry

319 Engineering research and devel establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 10 Engineering research and devel employers in Minnesota.

HID Global - Fargo (124 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate HID Global - Fargo
HID Global - Fargo (124 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

HID Global - Fargo has fewer employees than the Engineering research and development lab median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · MN · Eden Prairie

319 Engineering research and development laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 242 employers in Eden Prairie, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Syngenta Greensboro 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ExxonMobil Chemical Company Baytown Technology & Engineering Complex 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waymo HQ 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chamblee Campus 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE S.J. Louis Construction, INC 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building Restoration Corporation 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE USI (Hastings/Rogers, MN) 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4374 St Cloud MN Container 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN101 1,940 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN051 1,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota 1,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fortra, LLC 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 432 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 426 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 240 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 231 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fulton Gardens Post Acute 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denver Production 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Citadel Drilling Ltd 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Standard Textile Carolina, Inc. 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.