Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Arizona

HieQ Logistics LLC

Tucson, AZ · ~87 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HieQ Logistics LLC runs at 196% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade D.

HieQ Logistics LLC: 12.8 TCR = 196% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HieQ Logistics LLC safety composite

HieQ Logistics LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.3

2022→2024

HieQ Logistics LLC injury rate improved

HieQ Logistics LLC's TCR fell 18.3 from 18.3 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 20.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=18.3 · 2023=20.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 12.8 · 196% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #107/130
  • PHOTO Executive Delivery, …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Executive Delivery, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

HieQ Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HieQ Logistics LLC averages 12.8 TCR (196% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HieQ Logistics LLC TCR series: 2022=18.3 · 2023=20 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where HieQ Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 130 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Arizona.

HieQ Logistics LLC (87 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate HieQ Logistics LLC
HieQ Logistics LLC (87 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

HieQ Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 20.0 2.1 19 0 0
2022 18.3 4.6 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · AZ · Tucson

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Executive Delivery, Inc 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR WORD AND DEED LOGISTICS, LLC 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 879 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Choice Delivery LLC 12.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fondomonte Vicksburg Farm 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Surprise Office 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWG CTRL AZ - ADMIN OFFICE 0042-FAC13 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wespac Construction 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Guilford House 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Big R of Colorado Springs, LLC. 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Executive Delivery, Inc 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Johns Dental Lab 12.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE PB-MUS-PLATTSBURGH 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arcadia Care Bloomington LLC 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crosstown Surgery Center 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minnesota West Community & Technical College Worthington 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.