Highway, street and bridge lighting and electrical signal installation · California

High-Light Electric Inc.

Colton, CA · ~100 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

High-Light Electric Inc. runs at 286% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Highway, street and bridge lighting and electrical signal installation workplace, earning a grade F.

High-Light Electric Inc.: 8.0 TCR = 286% of Highway, street and bridge lighting and electrical signal installation BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

High-Light Electric Inc. safety composite

High-Light Electric Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.5

2022→2024

High-Light Electric Inc. injury rate improved

High-Light Electric Inc.'s TCR fell 6.5 from 13.2 in 2022 to 6.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 13.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=13.2 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=6.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Colton, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 286% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #475/548
  • PHOTO Reading, Pennsylvania
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reading, Pennsylvania (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

High-Light Electric Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows High-Light Electric Inc. averages 8.0 TCR (286% of the Highway, street and bridge lighting and electrical signal installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

High-Light Electric Inc. TCR series: 2022=13.2 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=6.7 · BLS 2.8

Where High-Light Electric Inc. falls in its industry

4,550 Highway, street and bridge lig establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #475 safest of 548 Highway, street and bridge lig employers in California.

High-Light Electric Inc. (100 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate High-Light Electric Inc.
High-Light Electric Inc. (100 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

High-Light Electric Inc. has more employees than the Highway, street and bridge lighting and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.7 1.1 6 0 0
2023 4.2 4.2 3 0 0
2022 13.2 9.4 13 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CA · Colton

4,550 Highway, street and bridge lighting and electrical signal installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 95 employers in Colton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Reading, Pennsylvania 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Automated Building Control Systems Inc Casselberry 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Electric 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gerard Electric LLC 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4Seasons Farms, LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bud of California Cauliflower 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Legacy Growers, LLC. 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE DE CRUZ FLC 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arrowhead Regional Medical Center 1,709 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 294 1,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 287 1,342 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 290 1,342 FTE
NAT-TCR Houston Methodist Baytown Hospital 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fisher & Thompson Inc 101 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Phoenix at James Creek 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brazil 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 62F3 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highway Steel 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Polaris Battle Ground 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chamberlain Group (Tuscon DC) 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.