Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

Highland Park Senior Living

Wilkes Barre Twp, PA · ~82 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Highland Park Senior Living runs at 257% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Highland Park Senior Living: 9.8 TCR = 257% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Highland Park Senior Living safety composite

Highland Park Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Highland Park Senior Living: 3.4 → 7.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 17.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.46× in 2024

Highland Park Senior Living's TCR rose 4.1 from 3.4 in 2018 to 7.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Wilkes Barre Twp, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 257% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #153/233
  • PHOTO Shores at Clearlake
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shores at Clearlake (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Highland Park Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Highland Park Senior Living averages 9.8 TCR (257% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Highland Park Senior Living TCR series: 2018=3.4 · 2022=17.5 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=7.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Highland Park Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #153 safest of 233 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Highland Park Senior Living (82 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Highland Park Senior Living
Highland Park Senior Living (82 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Highland Park Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.5 4.5 5 0 0
2023 10.6 7.1 6 0 0
2022 17.5 16.0 12 0 0
2018 3.4 3.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Wilkes Barre Twp

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shores at Clearlake 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Whittier 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Touchmark - TAAS 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Wellington at Conroe 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kiski 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE 868-NiSource-Bridgeville PA - Op Ctr 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHW 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zartman Construction, Inc. 82 FTE
NAT-TCR The Laurels of Defiance 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Florida DC6 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Spin Products 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR North Pacific Door Corporation 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE GRT Rubber Technologies 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Price Chopper #700 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Price Chopper #650 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE McKeever Market and Eatery #350 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.