Skilled Nursing Facility · California

Highland Park Skilled Nsg & Wlns Centre

Los Angeles, CA · ~91 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Highland Park Skilled Nsg & Wlns Centre runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled Nursing Facility workplace, earning a grade D.

Highland Park Skilled Nsg & Wlns Centre: 9.2 TCR = 142% of Skilled Nursing Facility BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Highland Park Skilled Nsg & Wlns Centre safety composite

Highland Park Skilled Nsg & Wlns Centre scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Highland Park Skilled Nsg & Wlns Centre: 10.7 → 18.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 18.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.98× in 2023

Highland Park Skilled Nsg & Wlns Centre's TCR rose 7.5 from 10.7 in 2018 to 18.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.2 · 142% of ind

  • DART 9.1 DART
  • RANK #451/739
  • PHOTO Sky View Rehabilitat…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sky View Rehabilitation and Health Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Highland Park Skilled Nsg & Wlns Centre in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Highland Park Skilled Nsg & Wlns Centre averages 9.2 TCR (142% of the Skilled Nursing Facility BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Highland Park Skilled Nsg & Wlns Centre TCR series: 2018=10.7 · 2019=7.8 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=18.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Highland Park Skilled Nsg & Wlns Centre falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled Nursing Facility establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #451 safest of 739 Skilled Nursing Facility employers in California.

Highland Park Skilled Nsg & Wlns Centre (91 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Highland Park Skilled Nsg & Wlns Centre
Highland Park Skilled Nsg & Wlns Centre (91 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Highland Park Skilled Nsg & Wlns Centre has fewer employees than the Skilled Nursing Facility median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 18.1 9.1 6 0 0
2022 4.7 4.7 3 0 0
2021 4.9 3.3 2 1 0
2019 7.8 6.2 4 1 0
2018 10.7 7.1 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Los Angeles

15,252 Skilled Nursing Facility employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sky View Rehabilitation and Health Care 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rensselaer Care Center 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hoosier Care, Inc 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royal Park Health SNF Operations, LLC 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CDK Agriculture, Inc. 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Belridge 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Micro Paradox 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFS, LP. 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Love's Truck Solutions 6120 Indianapolis, IN 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tulsa 1904 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Cly-Del Mfg. Company 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwest Abatement, Inc. 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Guardian Drug Co., Inc. 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Exceed Enterprises 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Budrovich Contracting Co Inc. 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carrington Health Center 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.