Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing · Missouri

Hiland Springfield MO

Springfield, MO · ~239 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hiland Springfield MO runs at 250% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Hiland Springfield MO: 8.3 TCR = 250% of Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hiland Springfield MO safety composite

Hiland Springfield MO scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

Hiland Springfield MO injury rate improved

Hiland Springfield MO's TCR fell 2.4 from 10.0 in 2016 to 7.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.0 · 2018=8.0 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=8.9 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=10.4 · 2024=7.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311511 · Springfield, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 250% of ind

  • DART 7.5 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO KDI Operating Company
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 196 inj
  • SIZE ~239 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KDI Operating Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Hiland Springfield MO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hiland Springfield MO averages 8.3 TCR (250% of the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hiland Springfield MO TCR series: 2016=10 · 2018=8 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=8.9 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=10.4 · 2024=7.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Hiland Springfield MO falls in its industry

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin employers in Missouri.

Hiland Springfield MO (239 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hiland Springfield MO
Hiland Springfield MO (239 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Hiland Springfield MO has more employees than the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.5 7.5 20 0 0
2023 10.4 10.4 28 0 0
2022 6.5 6.5 22 0 0
2021 8.9 8.0 28 0 0
2020 5.9 5.5 18 0 0
2019 8.8 7.2 26 1 0
2018 8.0 6.4 25 0 0
2016 10.0 8.0 29 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311511 · MO · Springfield

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 633 employers in Springfield, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KDI Operating Company 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crescent Ridge 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Farms Dairy Inc., Anderson 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meijer Manufacturing 812 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Red Wing Shoe Co. Potosi 239 FTE
STATE-SIZE Undercover Inc. - BAK 239 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central States Industrial 239 FTE
STATE-SIZE COLUMBIA (MOCOL) 239 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL SPRINGFIELD 4,885 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime, Inc. HQ 3,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corp 3,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bass Pro Corporate 1,888 FTE
NAT-TCR 1570 Lkq 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid-State Paving, LLC 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR DOT 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Duke Raleigh Hospital 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wareham Massachusetts 239 FTE
NAT-SIZE Headquarters 239 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stoner Electric, Inc. 239 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alpharetta, Georgia 239 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.