Clinical psychologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · California

Hillsides FRC East LA

Los Angeles, CA · ~67 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hillsides FRC East LA runs at 190% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Clinical psychologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade D.

Hillsides FRC East LA: 7.2 TCR = 190% of Clinical psychologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hillsides FRC East LA safety composite

Hillsides FRC East LA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.3

2018→2024

Hillsides FRC East LA injury rate improved

Hillsides FRC East LA's TCR fell 9.3 from 14.1 in 2018 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 58.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=14.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=58.1 · 2023=19.9 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621330 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.2 · 190% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #28/38
  • PHOTO Bradshaw Center Based
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bradshaw Center Based (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hillsides FRC East LA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hillsides FRC East LA averages 7.2 TCR (190% of the Clinical psychologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hillsides FRC East LA TCR series: 2018=14.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=58.1 · 2023=19.9 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Hillsides FRC East LA falls in its industry

137 Clinical psychologists' office establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 38 Clinical psychologists' office employers in California.

Hillsides FRC East LA (67 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hillsides FRC East LA
Hillsides FRC East LA (67 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hillsides FRC East LA has more employees than the Clinical psychologists' offices (e.g., c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 1.6 1 2 0
2023 19.9 18.1 0 11 0
2022 58.1 58.1 0 32 0
2021 3.2 1.6 2 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 0 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 14.1 4.7 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621330 · CA · Los Angeles

137 Clinical psychologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bradshaw Center Based 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louisville East 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Echo Park FRC 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midtown Clinic 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sonoma GVIC Ranches 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE MUGU RANCH PARTNERSHIP 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Travaille and Phippen, Inc. 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nurseries 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR The Home City Ice Company Route 128 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Synergy Equipment Sarasota 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR AJ Seabra Supermarket Inc 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Edward Homes 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hendrickson Transportation, LLC 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conditioned Air Systems, Inc. 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Team Concept Printing 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Red Cross - 444 Sherman 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.