Community action service agencies · Colorado

Hilltop Health Services Corporation

Grand Junction, CO · ~234 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hilltop Health Services Corporation runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Community action service agencies workplace, earning a grade C.

Hilltop Health Services Corporation: 3.4 TCR = 88% of Community action service agencies BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hilltop Health Services Corporation safety composite

Hilltop Health Services Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hilltop Health Services Corporation: 0.4 → 6.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.04× in 2019

Hilltop Health Services Corporation's TCR rose 6.5 from 0.4 in 2017 to 6.8 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 2.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Grand Junction, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 88% of ind

  • DART 6.8 DART
  • RANK #7/9
  • PHOTO Phoenix Houses of Ca…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~234 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Phoenix Houses of California. Inc. - ISP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Hilltop Health Services Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hilltop Health Services Corporation averages 3.4 TCR (88% of the Community action service agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hilltop Health Services Corporation TCR series: 2017=0.4 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=6.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Hilltop Health Services Corporation falls in its industry

990 Community action service agenc establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 9 Community action service agenc employers in Colorado.

Hilltop Health Services Corporation (234 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hilltop Health Services Corporation
Hilltop Health Services Corporation (234 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Hilltop Health Services Corporation has more employees than the Community action service agencies median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 6.8 6.8 1 1 0
2018 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2017 0.4 0.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · CO · Grand Junction

990 Community action service agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 233 employers in Grand Junction, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Houses of California. Inc. - ISP 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nonprofit Management Services of Colorado 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kings View- DDP Fresno 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE All American Pet Proteins 234 FTE
STATE-SIZE UTAS LandingSystems 234 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ferguson Enterprises LLC: CO Aurora - 22400 E. 19th Avenue 234 FTE
STATE-SIZE 620-00136 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital 2,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center 2,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital 1,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 609 27 1/2 Road 641 FTE
NAT-TCR Faf Iad 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR KOch Foods Ashland 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CP Technologies Company 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ethan Allen Design Center - Tustin CA 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Great Lakes Brewing Company 234 FTE
NAT-SIZE BemisUS Shirley 234 FTE
NAT-SIZE SmartWatt Energy, Inc. 234 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ardagh Metal Beverage-Winston-Salem 234 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.