Agriculture production or harvesting crews · Arizona

Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ

Yuma, AZ · ~599 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Agriculture production or harvesting crews workplace, earning a grade B.

Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ: 3.2 TCR = 72% of Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ safety composite

Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2019→2024

Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ injury rate improved

Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ's TCR fell 4.0 from 5.8 in 2019 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.8 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Yuma, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.2 · 72% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #3/18
  • PHOTO Lagorio Brothers, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~599 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lagorio Brothers, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ averages 3.2 TCR (72% of the Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ TCR series: 2019=5.8 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=4 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ falls in its industry

836 Agriculture production or harv establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 18 Agriculture production or harv employers in Arizona.

Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ (599 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ
Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ (599 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ has more employees than the Agriculture production or harvesting cre median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.7 13 0 0
2023 1.1 1.0 8 0 0
2022 1.7 0.8 4 0 0
2021 4.0 3.5 9 0 0
2020 4.9 4.9 12 0 0
2019 5.8 4.6 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · AZ · Yuma

836 Agriculture production or harvesting crews employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 274 employers in Yuma, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lagorio Brothers, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camarillo Berry Farms, LP 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Torres Farm Labor Contractor, Inc 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tierra Blanca FLC, Inc 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 9420 - Target Financial Services-Tempe 600 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rummel Construction Main Office 602 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maricopa County - Clerk of the Superior Court (160) 596 FTE
STATE-SIZE Modern Industries 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primetime Harvesting Inc 2,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing- Arizona 2,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuma Regional Medical Center 1,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR PGM PACKING INC 1,423 FTE
NAT-TCR Rouses Market #77 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ricoh Electronics Buford 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Felman Productions LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Stericycle - Fairfield,OH 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dist Office 599 FTE
NAT-SIZE JFK 599 FTE
NAT-SIZE J.R. Vinagro Corporation 599 FTE
NAT-SIZE Largo Concrete, Inc. 599 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.