Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · Washington

Hilton Garden Inn Bellevue

Seattle, WA · ~48 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hilton Garden Inn Bellevue runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade F.

Hilton Garden Inn Bellevue: 7.5 TCR = 249% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hilton Garden Inn Bellevue safety composite

Hilton Garden Inn Bellevue scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hilton Garden Inn Bellevue: 0.0 → 5.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 16.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.37× in 2023

Hilton Garden Inn Bellevue's TCR rose 5.5 from 0.0 in 2021 to 5.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 16.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 249% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #135/172
  • PHOTO Home2 Suites Highlan…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Home2 Suites Highlands Ranch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Hilton Garden Inn Bellevue in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hilton Garden Inn Bellevue averages 7.5 TCR (249% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hilton Garden Inn Bellevue TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=16.9 · 2023=5.5 · BLS 3.0

Where Hilton Garden Inn Bellevue falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #135 safest of 172 Hotel management services (i.e employers in Washington.

Hilton Garden Inn Bellevue (48 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hilton Garden Inn Bellevue
Hilton Garden Inn Bellevue (48 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hilton Garden Inn Bellevue has more employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.5 2.8 2 0 0
2022 16.9 2.4 7 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · WA · Seattle

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Home2 Suites Highlands Ranch 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR La Siesta Resort & Marina 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NoMo Soho 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kahler Grand Hotel 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cold Creek Vineyards #8 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE F/T Constellation 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE F/T Defender 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Esperanza Ridge LLC 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR 1376 - Owatonna Mn (Dry) Depot 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Eby-Brown Gibsonton 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Corson Feed 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Metcalf, Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE L&M Farms of Georgia, LLC 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #0258 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #0951 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #1081 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.