Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · Utah

Hilton Garden Inn Layton

Layton, UT · ~30 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hilton Garden Inn Layton runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade C.

Hilton Garden Inn Layton: 3.0 TCR = 100% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hilton Garden Inn Layton safety composite

Hilton Garden Inn Layton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2021→2024

Hilton Garden Inn Layton injury rate improved

Hilton Garden Inn Layton's TCR fell 0.7 from 6.3 in 2021 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=6.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Layton, UT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 100% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #27/107
  • PHOTO Riverstone Rentals LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Riverstone Rentals LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Hilton Garden Inn Layton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hilton Garden Inn Layton averages 3.0 TCR (100% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hilton Garden Inn Layton TCR series: 2021=6.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 3.0

Where Hilton Garden Inn Layton falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 107 Hotel management services (i.e employers in Utah.

Hilton Garden Inn Layton (30 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hilton Garden Inn Layton
Hilton Garden Inn Layton (30 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hilton Garden Inn Layton has fewer employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 5.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · UT · Layton

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 75 employers in Layton, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Riverstone Rentals LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chicago North Shore Hampton Inn & Suites 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JW Marriott Atlanta Buckhead 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairfield Chicago Midway 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE ProPetro Services -- Rocky Mountain Division 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jordanelle Special Service District 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE KEARNS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Primo Builders, LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Young Automotive Group 951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Layton Hospital 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR 796-DC796 436 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1699 403 FTE
NAT-TCR Productions Unlimited Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Manteo Elementary 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Foremost Farms USA (Appleton, WI) 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tar Heel NC MF Millwork 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Burgess Heating and Air, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Integrated Power Services Seattle Service Center 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doug Holmes Construction, LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Equipment Depot Mississippi, Inc. - Jackson 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.