Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations -i.e., ski resort · New Jersey

Hilton Newark Penn Station

Newark, NJ · ~113 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hilton Newark Penn Station runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations -i.e., ski resort workplace, earning a grade C.

Hilton Newark Penn Station: 3.0 TCR = 101% of Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations -i.e., ski resort BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hilton Newark Penn Station safety composite

Hilton Newark Penn Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Hilton Newark Penn Station injury rate improved

Hilton Newark Penn Station's TCR fell 0.4 from 4.2 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=9.1 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Newark, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 101% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #52/150
  • PHOTO Renaissance Nashvill…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Renaissance Nashville Hotel (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Hilton Newark Penn Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hilton Newark Penn Station averages 3.0 TCR (101% of the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations -i.e., ski resort BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hilton Newark Penn Station TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=9.1 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 3.0

Where Hilton Newark Penn Station falls in its industry

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 150 Alpine skiing facilities with employers in New Jersey.

Hilton Newark Penn Station (113 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hilton Newark Penn Station
Hilton Newark Penn Station (113 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hilton Newark Penn Station has more employees than the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 2.5 3 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2019 2.6 0.9 3 0 0
2017 9.1 3.0 9 0 0
2016 4.2 3.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · NJ · Newark

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations -i.e., ski resort employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 356 employers in Newark, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Renaissance Nashville Hotel 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hotel Icon Houston - WHG Icon Management LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Fargo Hospitality 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royalton Park Avenue 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hamon Custodis, Inc. 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ungerer & Company 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orora Visual NJ 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quincy Compressor LLC (Northeast Region) 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR EWR 13,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR - Airport United Airlines Offices 13,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-EWR 11,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWRPW9829 EWR - NON AA PAX SER 4,772 FTE
NAT-TCR Hotel Icon Houston - WHG Icon Management LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 0645 - Regency 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Es-Ascension Provide 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GenesisHealthSysMOB EVS 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0689 - Melbourne 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1793 - Charlotte East 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2308 - Bristol 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hispanic Ventures 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.