Automobiles assembling on chassis of own manufacture · Kentucky

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc.

Harrodsburg, KY · ~1,383 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc. runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Automobiles assembling on chassis of own manufacture workplace, earning a grade A.

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc.: 1.0 TCR = 30% of Automobiles assembling on chassis of own manufacture BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc. safety composite

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2020

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc. injury rate improved

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.6 from 1.2 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.2 · 2018=1.1 · 2020=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336111 · Harrodsburg, KY AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #2/8
  • PHOTO Capacity of Texas
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~1,383 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Capacity of Texas (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc. averages 1.0 TCR (30% of the Automobiles assembling on chassis of own manufacture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc. TCR series: 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.1 · 2020=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc. falls in its industry

158 Automobiles assembling on chas establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 8 Automobiles assembling on chas employers in Kentucky.

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc. (1,383 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc.
Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc. (1,383 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc. has more employees than the Automobiles assembling on chassis of own median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.6 0.6 7 0 0
2018 1.1 0.9 12 6 0
2017 1.2 0.8 19 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336111 · KY · Harrodsburg

158 Automobiles assembling on chassis of own manufacture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 19 employers in Harrodsburg, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Capacity of Texas 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Head Quarters (HQ) 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stoneridge Control Devices, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thyssenkrupp Automotive Systems 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Baptist Heatlh Paducah 1,398 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baptist Health Madisonville 1,361 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lourdes Hospital 1,358 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - CVG9 1,355 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hitachi Astemo 997 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corning 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Essity Operations Wausau LLC 368 FTE
CITY-NEAR 519 216 FTE
NAT-TCR Datamax O,Neil 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Region 04 CCSR FL-GA 90-04-01-96 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sharp HealthCare-SOC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Static Control Components - Plant 18 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE North American Lighting - Paris 1,383 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCR Medical Transportation 1,383 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Motors Components Holdings- Lockport, NY 1,383 FTE
NAT-SIZE Busch Gardens (BGW) 1,383 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.