Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) · Maryland

Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment

Owings Mills, MD · ~15 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) workplace, earning a grade C.

Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment safety composite

Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment held a steady TCR band

Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Owings Mills, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/11
  • PHOTO The Goettle Company
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~15 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Goettle Company (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment falls in its industry

932 Railway construction (e.g., in establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 11 Railway construction (e.g., in employers in Maryland.

Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment (15 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment
Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment (15 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment has fewer employees than the Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · MD · Owings Mills

932 Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 80 employers in Owings Mills, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Goettle Company 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turner at Sasol North America Westlake LA 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Olin Corporation Freeport TX 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Standard Constructors, Inc. 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gaithersburg Office 15 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4802 - Upper Marlboro, MD 15 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hitachi-Wheelabrator Baghouse 15 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ned Stevens Gutters of MD 15 FTE
CITY-NEAR DGS Construction, LLC 1,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clampett Industries LLC d/b/a EMG - Corporate Office 554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schuster Ready Mix, LLC 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Owings Mills 125 333 FTE
NAT-TCR RenCen - Tower 500 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 88 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 100 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 203 0.0 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.