Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade · Texas

H&M Plating Co., Inc.

Houston, TX · ~73 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

H&M Plating Co., Inc. runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade A.

H&M Plating Co., Inc.: 1.0 TCR = 30% of Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

H&M Plating Co., Inc. safety composite

H&M Plating Co., Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

H&M Plating Co., Inc.: 0.0 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.3× in 2024

H&M Plating Co., Inc.'s TCR rose 1.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 30% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #9/43
  • PHOTO Columbus Roll Shop
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Columbus Roll Shop (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

H&M Plating Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows H&M Plating Co., Inc. averages 1.0 TCR (30% of the Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

H&M Plating Co., Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where H&M Plating Co., Inc. falls in its industry

585 Anodizing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 43 Anodizing metals and metal pro employers in Texas.

H&M Plating Co., Inc. (73 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate H&M Plating Co., Inc.
H&M Plating Co., Inc. (73 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

H&M Plating Co., Inc. has more employees than the Anodizing metals and metal products for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 0 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2018 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · TX · Houston

585 Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Columbus Roll Shop 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR C&S Sales Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Protective Coatings Inc 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Williams Plating Company, Inc 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eden Green Technology 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Mill Creek 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE T-Rey Properties Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR 80-Jacksonville Marriott 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR West Memphis 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Enid 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilcor International - Frankfort, NY 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clifton Fine Health Care Corporation 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Tinning & Galvanizing Co. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glacial Lakes Energy, LLC 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crystal River 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.