Seasonal property maintenance services (i.e., snow plowing in winter, landscaping during other seasons) · Ohio

H&M Snow Pros, Inc.

Newbury, OH · ~60 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

H&M Snow Pros, Inc. runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Seasonal property maintenance services (i.e., snow plowing in winter, landscaping during other seasons) workplace, earning a grade C.

H&M Snow Pros, Inc.: 5.4 TCR = 120% of Seasonal property maintenance services (i.e., snow plowing in winter, landscaping during other seasons) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

H&M Snow Pros, Inc. safety composite

H&M Snow Pros, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

H&M Snow Pros, Inc.: 0.0 → 9.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 13.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.75× in 2024

H&M Snow Pros, Inc.'s TCR rose 9.4 from 0.0 in 2017 to 9.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 13.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Newbury, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.4 · 120% of ind

  • DART 9.4 DART
  • RANK #156/215
  • PHOTO Bala Cynwyd, PA
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bala Cynwyd, PA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

H&M Snow Pros, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows H&M Snow Pros, Inc. averages 5.4 TCR (120% of the Seasonal property maintenance services (i.e., snow plowing in winter, landscaping during other seasons) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

H&M Snow Pros, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=13.6 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=9.4 · BLS 4.5

Where H&M Snow Pros, Inc. falls in its industry

2,875 Seasonal property maintenance establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #156 safest of 215 Seasonal property maintenance employers in Ohio.

H&M Snow Pros, Inc. (60 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate H&M Snow Pros, Inc.
H&M Snow Pros, Inc. (60 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

H&M Snow Pros, Inc. has more employees than the Seasonal property maintenance services ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.4 9.4 1 0 0
2023 5.3 5.3 1 0 0
2022 9.3 0.0 2 0 0
2021 13.6 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · OH · Newbury

2,875 Seasonal property maintenance services (i.e., snow plowing in winter, landscaping during other seasons) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 18 employers in Newbury, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bala Cynwyd, PA 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR JSA Company 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Landscaping & Construction 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4829-12476 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE White House Fruit Farm Inc 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wholesale 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greater Cleveland Habitat for Humanity West 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gutknecht Construction Company 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQT1-Prior Building 1 Newbury, OH 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kuhnle Brothers Inc. 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prior Building 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR KBI 130 FTE
NAT-TCR Cushions to Go Pontotoc 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Anaconda Foundry Fabrication Co. Inc 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Philhaven 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Children's Museum of Phoenix 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sioux Falls Transportation 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Bellevue Medical Center Evs 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Grandview C4 Sd Janitorial 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mesa - Hillcrest 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.