Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production · California

HM.CLAUSE Davis East Research Station

Davis, CA · ~18 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HM.CLAUSE Davis East Research Station runs at 245% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production workplace, earning a grade F.

HM.CLAUSE Davis East Research Station: 11.0 TCR = 245% of Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HM.CLAUSE Davis East Research Station safety composite

HM.CLAUSE Davis East Research Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.2

2019→2024

HM.CLAUSE Davis East Research Station injury rate improved

HM.CLAUSE Davis East Research Station's TCR fell 6.2 from 6.2 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 23.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.2 · 2020=18.6 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=23.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111219 · Davis, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.0 · 245% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #159/175
  • PHOTO T&A Onions - Huron -…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~18 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: T&A Onions - Huron - Harvest (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

HM.CLAUSE Davis East Research Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HM.CLAUSE Davis East Research Station averages 11.0 TCR (245% of the Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HM.CLAUSE Davis East Research Station TCR series: 2019=6.2 · 2020=18.6 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=23.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where HM.CLAUSE Davis East Research Station falls in its industry

331 Tomato farming (except under c establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #159 safest of 175 Tomato farming (except under c employers in California.

HM.CLAUSE Davis East Research Station (18 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate HM.CLAUSE Davis East Research Station
HM.CLAUSE Davis East Research Station (18 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5

HM.CLAUSE Davis East Research Station has fewer employees than the Tomato farming (except under cover), fie median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 23.1 15.4 0 3 0
2022 7.3 7.3 0 1 0
2020 18.6 12.4 3 0 0
2019 6.2 6.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111219 · CA · Davis

331 Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 63 employers in Davis, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR T&A Onions - Huron - Harvest 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Featherstone Fruits and Vegetables LLC. 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Red Fire Farm 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR T&A Onions - Salinas - Harvest 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Henry Hibino Farms LLC 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE BATAVIA, INC. 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gold Coast Farms 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLRDG 18 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis 24,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30290) 714 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Davis Hospital (110-3001) 621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Teichert Construction Woodland 382 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 8026 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Indy George Sales Branch 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lincoln Moving & Storage 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1260 - Stroudsburg 11.0 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.