Welding wire or rods (i.e., coated, cored) manufacturing · Michigan

Hobart Aluminum Operations

Traverse City, MI · ~42 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hobart Aluminum Operations runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Welding wire or rods (i.e., coated, cored) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Hobart Aluminum Operations: 3.9 TCR = 119% of Welding wire or rods (i.e., coated, cored) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hobart Aluminum Operations safety composite

Hobart Aluminum Operations scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.6

2018→2024

Hobart Aluminum Operations injury rate improved

Hobart Aluminum Operations's TCR fell 9.6 from 9.6 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333992 · Traverse City, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 119% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/16
  • PHOTO Second Chance Enterp…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Second Chance Enterprises (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Hobart Aluminum Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hobart Aluminum Operations averages 3.9 TCR (119% of the Welding wire or rods (i.e., coated, cored) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hobart Aluminum Operations TCR series: 2018=9.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Hobart Aluminum Operations falls in its industry

129 Welding wire or rods (i.e., co establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 16 Welding wire or rods (i.e., co employers in Michigan.

Hobart Aluminum Operations (42 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Hobart Aluminum Operations
Hobart Aluminum Operations (42 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Hobart Aluminum Operations has fewer employees than the Welding wire or rods (i.e., coated, core median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 6.9 6.9 3 0 0
2021 8.7 6.5 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.6 7.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333992 · MI · Traverse City

129 Welding wire or rods (i.e., coated, cored) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 197 employers in Traverse City, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Second Chance Enterprises 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stoody Company 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Systems Division - South & Warehouse 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Select-Arc Ft. Loramie 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE General Meter 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Jackson 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pennings & Sons 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CR Meyer - Muskegon 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Munson Medical Center 3,845 FTE
CITY-NEAR Munson Healthcare 830 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northwestern Michigan College 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northwestern Michigan College - 28999 569 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale North Austin 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Brittany Point Estates 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Synthetic Turf Resources 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Labette Health 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Erectors,Inc 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE L&D Vermont 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hewlett Parts & Accessories 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Francis 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.