Food machinery repair and maintenance services · North Carolina

Hobart Service, Charlotte

Charlotte, NC · ~26 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hobart Service, Charlotte runs at 161% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Food machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Hobart Service, Charlotte: 3.4 TCR = 161% of Food machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hobart Service, Charlotte safety composite

Hobart Service, Charlotte scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hobart Service, Charlotte: 3.4 → 6.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 6.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2021

Hobart Service, Charlotte's TCR rose 3.4 from 3.4 in 2019 to 6.8 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.4 · 161% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #44/72
  • PHOTO Hussmann Services Co…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hussmann Services Corporation - Davenport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Hobart Service, Charlotte in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hobart Service, Charlotte averages 3.4 TCR (161% of the Food machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hobart Service, Charlotte TCR series: 2019=3.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.8 · BLS 2.1

Where Hobart Service, Charlotte falls in its industry

2,560 Food machinery repair and main establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 72 Food machinery repair and main employers in North Carolina.

Hobart Service, Charlotte (26 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Hobart Service, Charlotte
Hobart Service, Charlotte (26 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Hobart Service, Charlotte has fewer employees than the Food machinery repair and maintenance se median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.8 3.4 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · NC · Charlotte

2,560 Food machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hussmann Services Corporation - Davenport 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR NMC Industrial Services LLC - ORR 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 87 Maintenance 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hobart Service, Manchester 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE R. A. Wood Farms, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yarbrough Farms LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOUTH LNM- EST 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Goldsboro Hatchery 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Marquette, The 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 43271p - Omaha Pec 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-503-Williams Sonoma 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern Group Ltd. 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE PrairieLand Partners - Winfield 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Obion Live Haul 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Architectural Granite and Marble Lenexa 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSC Metals, Inc. - Columbus-Parsons 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.