Food machinery repair and maintenance services · Indiana

Hobart Service, Indianapolis

Indianapolis, IN · ~25 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hobart Service, Indianapolis runs at 139% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Food machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Hobart Service, Indianapolis: 2.9 TCR = 139% of Food machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hobart Service, Indianapolis safety composite

Hobart Service, Indianapolis scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hobart Service, Indianapolis: 0.0 → 6.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 6.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.1× in 2021

Hobart Service, Indianapolis's TCR rose 6.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 6.4 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.9 · 139% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #52/90
  • PHOTO BATEMAN-HALL INC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BATEMAN-HALL INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Hobart Service, Indianapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hobart Service, Indianapolis averages 2.9 TCR (139% of the Food machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hobart Service, Indianapolis TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.4 · BLS 2.1

Where Hobart Service, Indianapolis falls in its industry

2,560 Food machinery repair and main establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 90 Food machinery repair and main employers in Indiana.

Hobart Service, Indianapolis (25 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Hobart Service, Indianapolis
Hobart Service, Indianapolis (25 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Hobart Service, Indianapolis has fewer employees than the Food machinery repair and maintenance se median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.4 3.2 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.2 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · IN · Indianapolis

2,560 Food machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BATEMAN-HALL INC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CALA 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alta Enterprises LLC- East Syracuse 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hussmann Services Corporation- San Antonio 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vincennes Hatchery 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE U.S. Aggregates, Inc - Corporate 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE RWE Renewables Services LLC-Wildcat 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin (Pwr Del-IN) 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Pratt Communications Inc. Paramount 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SouthernCarlson - Houston Eastex 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kent, WA Office CS 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Coburn1 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sail Energy, LLC DBA Pioneer Oil & Propane 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn - St. Louis Airport 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chandler Home2 Suites 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Happy Valley Hampton Inn & Suites 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.