Powder made from purchased iron or steel · Pennsylvania

Hoeganaes Corporation

Watsontown, PA · ~34 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hoeganaes Corporation runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Powder made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade B.

Hoeganaes Corporation: 2.6 TCR = 79% of Powder made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hoeganaes Corporation safety composite

Hoeganaes Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hoeganaes Corporation: 2.5 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 4.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.32× in 2024

Hoeganaes Corporation's TCR rose 1.0 from 2.5 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · Watsontown, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #16/29
  • PHOTO Riverside Steel, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Riverside Steel, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Hoeganaes Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hoeganaes Corporation averages 2.6 TCR (79% of the Powder made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hoeganaes Corporation TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Hoeganaes Corporation falls in its industry

206 Powder made from purchased iro establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 29 Powder made from purchased iro employers in Pennsylvania.

Hoeganaes Corporation (34 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hoeganaes Corporation
Hoeganaes Corporation (34 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Hoeganaes Corporation has fewer employees than the Powder made from purchased iron or steel median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2020 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · PA · Watsontown

206 Powder made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 10 employers in Watsontown, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Riverside Steel, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunbelt Steel Texas - Houston 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SteelSummit OH 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR FABco LLC Belt East and Corporate 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kaolin Mushroom Farms - West Grove Facility 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE George Didden Greenhouse 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Dairy 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.W. Sauder Inc 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moran Logistics 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Watsontown Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Watsontown Brick Company 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Turbotville 46 FTE
NAT-TCR The Malish Corporation 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ground Effects, LLC - Warren 1990 Facility 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Buckeye Machine Fabricators, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR American Building Systems LLC. 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wastequip Arvada 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yuma Region Four 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nashville 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern WV Paving 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.