Construction management, commercial and institutional building · Minnesota

Hoffmann + Uhlhorn Construction, Inc.

Minneapolis, MN · ~27 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hoffmann + Uhlhorn Construction, Inc. runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

Hoffmann + Uhlhorn Construction, Inc.: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hoffmann + Uhlhorn Construction, Inc. safety composite

Hoffmann + Uhlhorn Construction, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hoffmann + Uhlhorn Construction, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Hoffmann + Uhlhorn Construction, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/130
  • PHOTO Tripp Enterprises Inc
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tripp Enterprises Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Hoffmann + Uhlhorn Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hoffmann + Uhlhorn Construction, Inc. averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Hoffmann + Uhlhorn Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Hoffmann + Uhlhorn Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 130 Construction management, comme employers in Minnesota.

Hoffmann + Uhlhorn Construction, Inc. (27 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Hoffmann + Uhlhorn Construction, Inc.
Hoffmann + Uhlhorn Construction, Inc. (27 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Hoffmann + Uhlhorn Construction, Inc. has fewer employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MN · Minneapolis

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tripp Enterprises Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madison Construction 2016 OSHA 300 & 300A 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tepcon Construction Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilbane Building Company Houston 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fire Department 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cass Forest Products 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6276-62762010-005248 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE 505526 MN1775 ROOSEVELT RD 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Putzel Electrical Contractors, Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TXC101551 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Other Location 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR EPIC Tampa 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Helpline Youth Counseling Commerce Office 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kfv - Brittmoore 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premium Medical Service Card 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE S&H Logging 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.