Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Michigan

Hofmann Eau Claire Plant

Eau Claire, MI · ~56 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hofmann Eau Claire Plant runs at 296% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade F.

Hofmann Eau Claire Plant: 9.8 TCR = 296% of Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hofmann Eau Claire Plant safety composite

Hofmann Eau Claire Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2024

Hofmann Eau Claire Plant injury rate improved

Hofmann Eau Claire Plant's TCR fell 4.7 from 15.3 in 2016 to 10.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.3 · 2017=11.2 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=10.1 · 2020=10.6 · 2021=14.3 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=10.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Eau Claire, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 296% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #9/16
  • PHOTO CA Steel & Tube CST
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CA Steel & Tube CST (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Hofmann Eau Claire Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hofmann Eau Claire Plant averages 9.8 TCR (296% of the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hofmann Eau Claire Plant TCR series: 2016=15.3 · 2017=11.2 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=10.1 · 2020=10.6 · 2021=14.3 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=6 · 2024=10.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Hofmann Eau Claire Plant falls in its industry

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 16 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Michigan.

Hofmann Eau Claire Plant (56 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hofmann Eau Claire Plant
Hofmann Eau Claire Plant (56 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Hofmann Eau Claire Plant has fewer employees than the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.7 3.5 2 1 0
2023 6.0 3.0 1 1 0
2022 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2021 14.3 4.3 5 5 0
2020 10.6 6.1 7 0 0
2019 10.1 3.4 4 2 0
2018 7.9 1.6 4 1 0
2017 11.2 4.8 7 0 0
2016 15.3 2.8 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · MI · Eau Claire

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 3 employers in Eau Claire, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CA Steel & Tube CST 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR US Premier Tube Mills 201 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arntzen Corporation Woodstock 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MID-STATES TUBE CORPORATION 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE John B Schaendorf Dairy 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamtramck Energy Services 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE A. Lindberg & Sons Inc. 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cipparrone Contracting Inc 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shawnee Specialties INC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eau Claire Health Center 36 FTE
NAT-TCR XEJ 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Ridge Health Campus 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Farm 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Recology Western Oregon 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Triplett Wellman, Inc. 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willow Dale Wellness Village 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Excelsior Company Norwalk 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rinchem Company - CSC 14 Chandler 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.