Hotels (except casino hotels) · Illinois

Holiday Inn & Suites Chicago O'Hare Rosemont

Rosemont, IL · ~67 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Holiday Inn & Suites Chicago O'Hare Rosemont runs at 309% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade F.

Holiday Inn & Suites Chicago O'Hare Rosemont: 9.3 TCR = 309% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Holiday Inn & Suites Chicago O'Hare Rosemont safety composite

Holiday Inn & Suites Chicago O'Hare Rosemont scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.9

2016→2017

Holiday Inn & Suites Chicago O'Hare Rosemont injury rate improved

Holiday Inn & Suites Chicago O'Hare Rosemont's TCR fell 8.9 from 13.7 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.7 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.7 · 2017=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Rosemont, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 309% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #300/345
  • PHOTO Loop Hotels LLC DBA …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Loop Hotels LLC DBA Moonrise Hotel and Hotel Restaurant LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Holiday Inn & Suites Chicago O'Hare Rosemont in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Holiday Inn & Suites Chicago O'Hare Rosemont averages 9.3 TCR (309% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Holiday Inn & Suites Chicago O'Hare Rosemont TCR series: 2016=13.7 · 2017=4.8 · BLS 3.0

Where Holiday Inn & Suites Chicago O'Hare Rosemont falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #300 safest of 345 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in Illinois.

Holiday Inn & Suites Chicago O'Hare Rosemont (67 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Holiday Inn & Suites Chicago O'Hare Rosemont
Holiday Inn & Suites Chicago O'Hare Rosemont (67 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Holiday Inn & Suites Chicago O'Hare Rosemont has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 4.8 1.6 2 1 0
2016 13.7 0.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · IL · Rosemont

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 67 employers in Rosemont, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Loop Hotels LLC DBA Moonrise Hotel and Hotel Restaurant LLC 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR THE LODGE AT DUKE MEDICAL CENTER 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hilton Tucson East 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sarti Rohnert Park, LLC 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Decatur Cogeneration 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWECO - Chicago 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Galesburg 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE 75G - Western S - IL Gas Ops 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Foods, Inc. Rosemont 2,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospitality Staffing Inc. 1,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Foods Corporate Office 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACL Laboratories 1,069 FTE
NAT-TCR N and R of East Prairie Inc 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 0725 - Easton, Pa 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 9 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR GDC 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Strafford Inc 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Republic LLC 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cincinnati Holiday Inn 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE HBSHSENC20 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.