Paper (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood) manufacturing · New York

Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Easton Mill

Greenwich, NY · ~171 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Easton Mill runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Paper (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Easton Mill: 2.2 TCR = 67% of Paper (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Easton Mill safety composite

Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Easton Mill scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2019

Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Easton Mill injury rate improved

Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Easton Mill's TCR fell 0.9 from 2.5 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2017=2.5 · 2019=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322121 · Greenwich, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 67% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #9/32
  • PHOTO Munising
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~171 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Munising (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Easton Mill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Easton Mill averages 2.2 TCR (67% of the Paper (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Easton Mill TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=2.5 · 2019=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Easton Mill falls in its industry

317 Paper (except newsprint, uncoa establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 32 Paper (except newsprint, uncoa employers in New York.

Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Easton Mill (171 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 146 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Easton Mill
Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Easton Mill (171 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 146 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Easton Mill has more employees than the Paper (except newsprint, uncoated ground median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.6 1.1 3 0 0
2017 2.5 1.0 5 0 0
2016 2.5 1.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322121 · NY · Greenwich

317 Paper (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 17 employers in Greenwich, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Munising 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richmond- Paper - B312 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Essity Operations Wausau LLC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ND Paper 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Victory Blvd Service Ctr 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Corporate Total 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE MJ Mechanical Services, Inc 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE LNK - 100 Ricefield 171 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Fort Miller Co., Inc. 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR Easton 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08333 - Store # 8333Greenwich 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8333 140 FTE
NAT-TCR RealD Boulder 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Executive Mailing Services 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Western Reserve Water Systems Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Victory Packaging Fayetteville 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Apex Tool Group 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE HoneywellLA07BTR 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE KB Home AZ 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs -GOAA 171 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.