Homes for the aged with nursing care · Pennsylvania

Holy Redeemer Lafayette

Philadelphia, PA · ~295 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Holy Redeemer Lafayette runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Homes for the aged with nursing care workplace, earning a grade C.

Holy Redeemer Lafayette: 7.4 TCR = 114% of Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Holy Redeemer Lafayette safety composite

Holy Redeemer Lafayette scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2016→2024

Holy Redeemer Lafayette injury rate improved

Holy Redeemer Lafayette's TCR fell 3.6 from 7.8 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 17.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.8 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=8.5 · 2019=8.0 · 2020=17.6 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Philadelphia, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 7.4 · 114% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #371/754
  • PHOTO Caregivers of Pleasa…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 97 inj
  • SIZE ~295 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Caregivers of Pleasant Grove, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Holy Redeemer Lafayette in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Holy Redeemer Lafayette averages 7.4 TCR (114% of the Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Holy Redeemer Lafayette TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=8.5 · 2019=8 · 2020=17.6 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Holy Redeemer Lafayette falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursin establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #371 safest of 754 Homes for the aged with nursin employers in Pennsylvania.

Holy Redeemer Lafayette (295 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Holy Redeemer Lafayette
Holy Redeemer Lafayette (295 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Holy Redeemer Lafayette has more employees than the Homes for the aged with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 3.4 5 0 0
2023 8.3 8.3 10 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 4 0 0
2020 17.6 17.6 7 25 0
2019 8.0 7.1 17 0 0
2018 8.5 8.0 18 0 0
2017 7.9 7.0 17 0 0
2016 7.8 6.9 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Philadelphia

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Caregivers of Pleasant Grove, Inc 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pruitt Health Elkin 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diversicare of Southaven 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Haven Manor Health Care Center 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Knouse Foods Coop, Inc - Orrtanna 295 FTE
STATE-SIZE BlueTriton Brands - Allentown East Facility 295 FTE
STATE-SIZE C&J 295 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blair Image Elements - Main 295 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Lincoln Surgical Hospital 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Stockton Steel 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 119800 Sleepys Chicago Warehouse 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Eco Wood Solutions 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Finkl Steel 295 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hartford Correctional Center 295 FTE
NAT-SIZE CS Wholesale Grocers : Miami, FL (GDC) 295 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maine East High School 295 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.