Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Ohio

Holzer Center for Cancer Care

Gallipolis, OH · ~54 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Holzer Center for Cancer Care runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade B.

Holzer Center for Cancer Care: 4.6 TCR = 61% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Holzer Center for Cancer Care safety composite

Holzer Center for Cancer Care scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Holzer Center for Cancer Care held a steady TCR band

Holzer Center for Cancer Care's TCR held near 0.2 from 6.5 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.5 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=6.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Gallipolis, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.6 · 61% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #220/352
  • PHOTO SH - Building B
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SH - Building B (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Holzer Center for Cancer Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Holzer Center for Cancer Care averages 4.6 TCR (61% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Holzer Center for Cancer Care TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=6.3 · BLS 7.5

Where Holzer Center for Cancer Care falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #220 safest of 352 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Ohio.

Holzer Center for Cancer Care (54 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Holzer Center for Cancer Care
Holzer Center for Cancer Care (54 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Holzer Center for Cancer Care has fewer employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.3 4.2 0 3 0
2021 8.2 2.0 0 4 0
2020 6.7 2.2 1 2 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.1 0.0 0 1 0
2017 2.2 0.0 0 1 0
2016 6.5 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · OH · Gallipolis

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 32 employers in Gallipolis, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SH - Building B 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAINT VINCENT HOSPITAL 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AdventHealth Winter Garden 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AdventHealth Lenexa 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE C.M. Brown Nurseries, Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butt Construction Co., Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Office/Shop 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ferguson Construction Comany-Columbus 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holzer Medical Center 794 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2605 320 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2605 311 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holzer Clinic Gallipolis 301 FTE
NAT-TCR 3495-10D8180 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 311360-Carson City Po 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 075706-Loveland Po 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 487570-Richmond Po 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1517 Family Fare -Boyne City, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1932 VGS - Owosso, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3436 Family Fare Lake Wissota fka Gordy's 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 9277-204 One Ski Hill Place 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.