Physical therapists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Ohio

Holzer Therapy and Wellness

Gallipolis, OH · ~22 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Holzer Therapy and Wellness runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Physical therapists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

Holzer Therapy and Wellness: 0.8 TCR = 21% of Physical therapists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Holzer Therapy and Wellness safety composite

Holzer Therapy and Wellness scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Holzer Therapy and Wellness held a steady TCR band

Holzer Therapy and Wellness's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621340 · Gallipolis, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/37
  • PHOTO Therapeutic Associat…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Therapeutic Associates, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Holzer Therapy and Wellness in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Holzer Therapy and Wellness averages 0.8 TCR (21% of the Physical therapists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Holzer Therapy and Wellness TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Holzer Therapy and Wellness falls in its industry

220 Physical therapists' offices ( establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 37 Physical therapists' offices ( employers in Ohio.

Holzer Therapy and Wellness (22 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Holzer Therapy and Wellness
Holzer Therapy and Wellness (22 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Holzer Therapy and Wellness has fewer employees than the Physical therapists' offices (e.g., cent median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.6 5.6 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621340 · OH · Gallipolis

220 Physical therapists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 32 employers in Gallipolis, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Therapeutic Associates, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PNNP BLOOMINGTON TRIA PHYS THERAPY 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TERRIO Physical Therapy & Fitness - TKids Meany Clinic 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ProHealth Partners 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agri-Med OH LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rapid Ford Farm 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pheasant Run 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lucasville Farm 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holzer Medical Center 794 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2605 320 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2605 311 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holzer Clinic Gallipolis 301 FTE
NAT-TCR King of Prussia Home Care 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Yorktown Plant 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HI003 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kauffman Engineering, LLC - HOP 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ashland Retail Plant 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colorado Hazard Control South Office 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hajoca Corporation - 740 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2073-SW-20730230-CS 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.