Aerial or picker truck, construction, rental with operator · Alabama

Home Office

Smiths Station, AL · ~66 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Home Office runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aerial or picker truck, construction, rental with operator workplace, earning a grade C.

Home Office: 2.6 TCR = 94% of Aerial or picker truck, construction, rental with operator BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Home Office safety composite

Home Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2016→2024

Home Office injury rate improved

Home Office's TCR fell 5.3 from 5.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.3 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Smiths Station, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 94% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/25
  • PHOTO Pooler Enterprises, …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pooler Enterprises, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Home Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Home Office averages 2.6 TCR (94% of the Aerial or picker truck, construction, rental with operator BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Home Office TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Home Office falls in its industry

1,750 Aerial or picker truck, constr establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 25 Aerial or picker truck, constr employers in Alabama.

Home Office (66 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Home Office
Home Office (66 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Home Office has more employees than the Aerial or picker truck, construction, re median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.1 2.4 6 0 0
2019 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2018 4.4 4.4 3 0 0
2017 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2016 5.3 5.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · AL · Smiths Station

1,750 Aerial or picker truck, construction, rental with operator employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pooler Enterprises, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fischer Idema Excavating 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dan Cristiani Excavating 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Costello Dismantling Company, Inc. 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Western Division Tuscaloosa Crew Headquarters 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Signature Homes-Birmingham office 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smith Douglas Alabama 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jim Cooper Construction Company, inc. 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franklin 53 FTE
NAT-TCR Kaba Ilco Corporation 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Apex Spring & Stamping Corporation 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Buena Vista Trading Company 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Shamrock Environmental Corp. (Greensboro) 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gabriel N. A. Distribution (Ride Control, LLC) 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Infinity Images, Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omron Electronic Components (OCB) 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seymour, in Branch 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.