Windows and window frames, vinyl, manufacturing · California

Hometime Windows & Doors

Upland, CA · ~33 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hometime Windows & Doors runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Windows and window frames, vinyl, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Hometime Windows & Doors: 6.0 TCR = 183% of Windows and window frames, vinyl, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hometime Windows & Doors safety composite

Hometime Windows & Doors scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2017→2024

Hometime Windows & Doors injury rate improved

Hometime Windows & Doors's TCR fell 2.7 from 7.6 in 2017 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 15.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.6 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=15.7 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Upland, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 183% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #74/117
  • PHOTO Corvac Composites, LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corvac Composites, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hometime Windows & Doors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hometime Windows & Doors averages 6.0 TCR (183% of the Windows and window frames, vinyl, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hometime Windows & Doors TCR series: 2017=7.6 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=15.7 · 2021=3 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Hometime Windows & Doors falls in its industry

2,838 Windows and window frames, vin establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 117 Windows and window frames, vin employers in California.

Hometime Windows & Doors (33 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hometime Windows & Doors
Hometime Windows & Doors (33 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Hometime Windows & Doors has fewer employees than the Windows and window frames, vinyl, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 4.9 2 0 0
2023 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 15.7 15.7 3 0 0
2018 8.8 0.0 2 0 0
2017 7.6 3.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · CA · Upland

2,838 Windows and window frames, vinyl, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 80 employers in Upland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corvac Composites, LLC 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flambeau Columbus 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Capper 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ECS Environmental Solutions 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tutti Frutti Farms 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL CENTRO 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS 18 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR San Antonio Regional Hospital 2,315 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Respite Care, Inc. 1,275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-036 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-007 908 FTE
NAT-TCR Oconee Medical Campus 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at St. Catherine Hospital 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR E A Sween Company-Lewisville 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Northfork Electric Cooperative 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ptcr Fairless Hills 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Cleaning Authority 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charlotte South 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walkup Company 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.