Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · North Carolina

Homewood Suites Charlotte Airport

Charlotte, NC · ~28 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Homewood Suites Charlotte Airport runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade C.

Homewood Suites Charlotte Airport: 3.1 TCR = 102% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Homewood Suites Charlotte Airport safety composite

Homewood Suites Charlotte Airport scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Homewood Suites Charlotte Airport: 0.0 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2.76× in 2021

Homewood Suites Charlotte Airport's TCR rose 8.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 8.4 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 2.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 102% of ind

  • DART 8.4 DART
  • RANK #89/239
  • PHOTO Rochester Aspen Suites
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rochester Aspen Suites (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Homewood Suites Charlotte Airport in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Homewood Suites Charlotte Airport averages 3.1 TCR (102% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Homewood Suites Charlotte Airport TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=0.1 · 2021=8.4 · BLS 3.0

Where Homewood Suites Charlotte Airport falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 239 Hotel management services (i.e employers in North Carolina.

Homewood Suites Charlotte Airport (28 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Homewood Suites Charlotte Airport
Homewood Suites Charlotte Airport (28 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Homewood Suites Charlotte Airport has fewer employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.4 8.4 1 0 0
2018 0.1 0.0 2 0 0
2017 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · NC · Charlotte

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rochester Aspen Suites 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holiday Inn Express New Martinsville WV 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Homestead Towneplace Suites 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Olympic Village Inn 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE H & D Farms, Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE SMITH FARMS 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michael Morris Farms 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elkin Hatchery 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR 626 - Santa Rosa 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Synergy Power Group LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Employment Options 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Avera Behavioral Health Dudley 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlanta Fulton County - AFC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cram-A-Lot Central 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHEP Services Newburgh TPM (UT5Q) 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.