Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Arizona

Honeywell Aerospace-Sky Harbor

Phoenix, AZ · ~1,523 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Honeywell Aerospace-Sky Harbor runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Honeywell Aerospace-Sky Harbor: 0.3 TCR = 10% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Honeywell Aerospace-Sky Harbor safety composite

Honeywell Aerospace-Sky Harbor scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Honeywell Aerospace-Sky Harbor held a steady TCR band

Honeywell Aerospace-Sky Harbor's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.2 in 2022 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.2 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #4/15
  • PHOTO Walbar Peabody LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~1,523 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Walbar Peabody LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Honeywell Aerospace-Sky Harbor in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Honeywell Aerospace-Sky Harbor averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Honeywell Aerospace-Sky Harbor TCR series: 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Honeywell Aerospace-Sky Harbor falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 15 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Arizona.

Honeywell Aerospace-Sky Harbor (1,523 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Honeywell Aerospace-Sky Harbor
Honeywell Aerospace-Sky Harbor (1,523 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Honeywell Aerospace-Sky Harbor has more employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.1 6 0 0
2023 0.4 0.1 7 0 0
2022 0.2 0.1 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · AZ · Phoenix

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Walbar Peabody LLC 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eaton Aerospace - Glenolden 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aerospace : Irvine MFCD 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PAKO, Inc. 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE SFE - Corporate 1,535 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ventana Medical Systems 1,505 FTE
STATE-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHX3 1,502 FTE
STATE-SIZE Town of Gilbert 1,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR LECO Corporation -- RJW CEC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Waterford at West Bend 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Gaylor Electric, inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 207 1,523 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kern Valley State Prison 1,523 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Ice Cream Plant 1,523 FTE
NAT-SIZE BP Whiting Refinery 1,522 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.