Chemical research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) · Illinois

Honeywell IL17

Mccook, IL · ~183 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Honeywell IL17 runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Chemical research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade D.

Honeywell IL17: 0.8 TCR = 150% of Chemical research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Honeywell IL17 safety composite

Honeywell IL17 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2019→2024

Honeywell IL17 injury rate improved

Honeywell IL17's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.4 in 2019 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Mccook, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 0.8 · 150% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #9/14
  • PHOTO Blue River Technology
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~183 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blue River Technology (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Honeywell IL17 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Honeywell IL17 averages 0.8 TCR (150% of the Chemical research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Honeywell IL17 TCR series: 2019=1.4 · 2020=0 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 0.5

Where Honeywell IL17 falls in its industry

319 Chemical research and developm establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 14 Chemical research and developm employers in Illinois.

Honeywell IL17 (183 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Honeywell IL17
Honeywell IL17 (183 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Honeywell IL17 has more employees than the Chemical research and development labora median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2023 0.9 0.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.4 1.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · IL · Mccook

319 Chemical research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 37 employers in Mccook, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blue River Technology 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glanbia Whey R&D 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Technical Center 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR UH Cancer Center 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 40K - IL Sub Maint & Ops 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maywood 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE Christopher Glass 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE ENA HQ 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4813-48130009-FREEMAN EXPO CHICAGO 882 FTE
CITY-NEAR 48130009-FREEMAN EXPO CHICAGO MIDWEST 567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Assemblers at McCook 457 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fontanini Foods 445 FTE
NAT-TCR McCurley Houston Electric Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Port Arthur Tx of 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Memc Soi 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR KBC Home Office 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE WAI Global - Southaven 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE CCL Tube 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Menasha Packaging Company - Philadelphia 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE XMI 183 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.