Jet propulsion and internal combustion engines and parts, aircraft, manufacturing · Arizona

Honeywell Phoenix Engines

Phoenix, AZ · ~1,889 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Honeywell Phoenix Engines runs at 8% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Jet propulsion and internal combustion engines and parts, aircraft, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Honeywell Phoenix Engines: 0.3 TCR = 8% of Jet propulsion and internal combustion engines and parts, aircraft, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Honeywell Phoenix Engines safety composite

Honeywell Phoenix Engines scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Honeywell Phoenix Engines held a steady TCR band

Honeywell Phoenix Engines's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.2 in 2018 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.2 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.3 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 8% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #2/15
  • PHOTO HoneywellAZ17
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~1,889 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HoneywellAZ17 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Honeywell Phoenix Engines in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Honeywell Phoenix Engines averages 0.3 TCR (8% of the Jet propulsion and internal combustion engines and parts, aircraft, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Honeywell Phoenix Engines TCR series: 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.3 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Honeywell Phoenix Engines falls in its industry

366 Jet propulsion and internal co establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 15 Jet propulsion and internal co employers in Arizona.

Honeywell Phoenix Engines (1,889 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Honeywell Phoenix Engines
Honeywell Phoenix Engines (1,889 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Honeywell Phoenix Engines has more employees than the Jet propulsion and internal combustion e median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.2 5 0 0
2023 0.2 0.1 4 0 0
2021 0.3 0.2 6 0 0
2020 0.3 0.2 5 0 0
2019 0.2 0.1 5 0 0
2018 0.2 0.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · AZ · Phoenix

366 Jet propulsion and internal combustion engines and parts, aircraft, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HoneywellAZ17 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain DCC-Dayton 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbus Engine Center Plant 2 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HoneywellNC03 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - TUS1 1,890 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goodyear D2C 1,898 FTE
STATE-SIZE OSBORN MEDICAL CTR CAMPUS 1,898 FTE
STATE-SIZE HoneywellAZ18 1,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Ocala Operations 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR BrandSafway LDAR LLC - Houston-Branch 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR BrandSafway LLC - Covestro Chemical - Baytown 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SAMES Inc 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE HCA Florida Memorial Hospital 1,889 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bass Pro Corporate 1,888 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dot Foods, Inc.- MTS Dot 1,890 FTE
NAT-SIZE Piedmont Columbus Midtown Hospital 1,890 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.